Difference between revisions of "Talk:Relationship"
From AVENwiki
Wikimaster (talk | contribs) m (indented for clarity) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
--[[User:Ghosts|Ghosts]] 10:02, 30 October 2006 (MST) | --[[User:Ghosts|Ghosts]] 10:02, 30 October 2006 (MST) | ||
| − | Ok, this is gonna take me awhile. Any suggestions? Think it's a good idea to have a separate page for Relationships? What kinds of things should go on here? | + | :Ok, this is gonna take me awhile. Any suggestions? Think it's a good idea to have a separate page for Relationships? What kinds of things should go on here? |
| − | --[[User:Ghosts|Ghosts]] 14:03, 30 October 2006 (MST) | + | :--[[User:Ghosts|Ghosts]] 14:03, 30 October 2006 (MST) |
| − | ......Ok, got this stuff up finally. Any suggestions? | + | ::......Ok, got this stuff up finally. Any suggestions? |
| − | --[[User:Ghosts|Ghosts]] 17:28, 23 November 2006 (EST) | + | ::--[[User:Ghosts|Ghosts]] 17:28, 23 November 2006 (EST) |
| − | Ack sorry. I've been neglecting the Wiki in favour of AVENues, but now that's died down and I can look at this again. Excellent work - though I'm intrigued by the "Family Models" heading. I've never heard of an asexual family model that differs from sexual ones, so now I'm eager to read about them and see what I've been missing. ^^ [[User:Wikimaster|Wikimaster]] 18:26, 27 November 2006 (EST) | + | :::Ack sorry. I've been neglecting the Wiki in favour of AVENues, but now that's died down and I can look at this again. Excellent work - though I'm intrigued by the "Family Models" heading. I've never heard of an asexual family model that differs from sexual ones, so now I'm eager to read about them and see what I've been missing. ^^ [[User:Wikimaster|Wikimaster]] 18:26, 27 November 2006 (EST) |
| − | Well, it's more like the concept of "chosen families"... Anyway, here's the thread that I was thinking of- http://asexuality.org/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=19106 So, I'd be putting in stuff like that from Hu & Omnes. Also wondering if sensuality should be up on the wiki somewhere... --[[User:Ghosts|Ghosts]] 07:36, 28 November 2006 (EST) | + | ::::Well, it's more like the concept of "chosen families"... Anyway, here's the thread that I was thinking of- http://asexuality.org/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=19106 So, I'd be putting in stuff like that from Hu & Omnes. Also wondering if sensuality should be up on the wiki somewhere... --[[User:Ghosts|Ghosts]] 07:36, 28 November 2006 (EST) |
Thanks for adding to sensuality, Hallu! I might add to it later and/or dig up a thread when I have more time. | Thanks for adding to sensuality, Hallu! I might add to it later and/or dig up a thread when I have more time. | ||
--[[User:Ghosts|Ghosts]] 12:00, 9 December 2006 (EST) | --[[User:Ghosts|Ghosts]] 12:00, 9 December 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:26, 9 December 2006
Just trying this discussion feature out...
Thought it would be good to start up a separate page for relationships in general, & have some theory talk on here.
--Ghosts 10:02, 30 October 2006 (MST)
- Ok, this is gonna take me awhile. Any suggestions? Think it's a good idea to have a separate page for Relationships? What kinds of things should go on here?
- --Ghosts 14:03, 30 October 2006 (MST)
- ......Ok, got this stuff up finally. Any suggestions?
- --Ghosts 17:28, 23 November 2006 (EST)
- Ack sorry. I've been neglecting the Wiki in favour of AVENues, but now that's died down and I can look at this again. Excellent work - though I'm intrigued by the "Family Models" heading. I've never heard of an asexual family model that differs from sexual ones, so now I'm eager to read about them and see what I've been missing. ^^ Wikimaster 18:26, 27 November 2006 (EST)
- Well, it's more like the concept of "chosen families"... Anyway, here's the thread that I was thinking of- http://asexuality.org/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=19106 So, I'd be putting in stuff like that from Hu & Omnes. Also wondering if sensuality should be up on the wiki somewhere... --Ghosts 07:36, 28 November 2006 (EST)
Thanks for adding to sensuality, Hallu! I might add to it later and/or dig up a thread when I have more time. --Ghosts 12:00, 9 December 2006 (EST)
